USPTO serial 85321940
EYEQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EYEQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Emeryville, CA
Emeryville, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda M. Goldman
LINDA M GOLDMAN FENWICK WEST LLP801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041 1990UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for searching, identifying, accessing and obtaining reviews, schedules, descriptions and personalized recommendations from an online database about music, movies, television, actors, artists, video games, radio shows, on automotive music systems and infotainment systems | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 26, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 9, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 9, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 31, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |