USPTO serial 85323085
NIO PULSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NIO PULSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for the design, checking and testing of electronic circuits; training and skill development software in the field of electronic circuit design for electronic circuit design engineers | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education services, namely, providing of workshops and training for electronic circuit design engineers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services, namely, design, checking and testing of electronic circuits and design and development of electronic circuit design, checking and testing software; design and development of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Niocad (Pty) Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Niocad (Pty) Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NIO PULSE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 28, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 21, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 25, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 31, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 29, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 2, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |