Drawing for BUILDING SMILES TOGETHER

USPTO serial 85323417

BUILDING SMILES TOGETHER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ELLINGER FATHY, JESSICA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BUILDING SMILES TOGETHER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Melanie Bradley

Melanie Bradley COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY300 PARK AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, a program to promote oral care, dental hygiene and dental careACTIVE
044Providing dental screenings and consultations at retail storesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 13, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 13, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 26, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 25, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jun 12, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 12, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 22, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Dec 21, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 21, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Dec 12, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 12, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 12, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 17, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Apr 17, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 9, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 9, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 22, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 22, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 21, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 21, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 21, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 22, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 20, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance