USPTO serial 85329076
MONSTER HIGH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MONSTER HIGH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
EL SEGUNDO, CA
EL SEGUNDO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MATT SOLMON
MATT SOLMON MATTEL, INC.333 CONTINENTAL BOULEVARDM1-1518EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | RAIN SLICKERS, DO RAGS, BELTS, EARMUFFS, TIES, SWIM TRUNKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 14, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 21, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 10, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 15, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 15, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 30, 2012 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Dec 30, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 30, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 28, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 10, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 6, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |