Drawing for RECYCLING - THE PROVEN SOLUTION TO PLASTIC POLLUTION

USPTO serial 85330908

RECYCLING - THE PROVEN SOLUTION TO PLASTIC POLLUTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RECYCLING - THE PROVEN SOLUTION TO PLASTIC POLLUTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven J. Nataupsky

STEVEN J. NATAUPSKY KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN ST FL 14IRVINE, CA 92614-8214UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Packaging containers of plasticACTIVE—
040Recycling servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 25, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 25, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 7, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 18, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 18, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 17, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 16, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 10, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 23, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 23, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 24, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 22, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 22, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 24, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 29, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 29, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 9, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 24, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 4, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 13, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2011GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2011GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2011CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Sep 13, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 1, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 30, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance