USPTO serial 85331049
ABUSEONMEN.ORG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ABUSEONMEN.ORG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Costa Mesa, CA
Costa Mesa, CA
Costa Mesa, CA
Costa Mesa, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry C. Seaton
BARRY C. SEATON SEATON LAW GROUP, PC18662 MACARTHUR BLVD STE 200IRVINE, CA 92612-1285UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Charitable services, namely, promoting public awareness about the issues of abused men and gender equality, providing a free online resource in the nature of a website for connecting people with a service need in the areas of abused men and gender equality with related service professionals; Providing a searchable website featuring the goods and services of other vendors in the fields of abused men and gender equality; Providing an internet website featuring news and information for promoting public awareness relating to the issues of abused men and gender equality; Providing an Internet website to promote awareness of issues relating to abused men and gender equality; Promoting public awareness of the issues of abused men and gender equality; Public advocacy to promote awareness of issues of abused men and gender equality in society, culture and the judicial system | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Charitable services, namely, providing education materials in the nature of serial articles, handouts, brochures, newsletters, pamphlets, books, magazines and videos to others on issues of physically, emotionally and financially abused men and gender equality, and providing educational services, namely, providing classes, seminars and workshops on issues of physically, emotionally and financially abused men and gender equality including domestic violence | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Johnny L. Sears Jr.
- Other trademarks owned by Johnny L. Sears Jr.
- Other trademarks owned by Jack A. Jeffries
- Other trademarks owned by Jack A. Jeffries
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ABUSEONMEN.ORG
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 12, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 10, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 14, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 25, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |