USPTO serial 85331591
CARD NOT PRESENT SIGNATURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4340126Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 21, 2013
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CARD NOT PRESENT SIGNATURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian A. Tollefson
LEO M LOUGHLIN ROTHWELL FIGG ERNST & MANBECK PC607 14TH STREET NWSUITE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | CREDIT CARD PAYMENT PROCESSING SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 8, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 21, 2013 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 18, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 26, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 24, 2012 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2012 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2012 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |