USPTO serial 85332907
CHNL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASSIDY, COLLEEN MULCRONE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHNL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SANTA MONICA, CA
SANTA MONICA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tal Grinblat
TAL GRINBLAT Stubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP1453 3rd Street Promenade, Suite 300Santa Monica, CA 90401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and software applications for use in downloading, viewing, transferring, distributing, sharing, receiving and streaming of data, audio, video and other digital files, content and information; computer software and software applications for use in downloading, viewing, transferring, distributing, sharing, receiving and streaming of data, audio, video and other digital files, content and information via the Internet, mobile devices, wireless internet networks or systems and other computer and electronic communication networks; providing downloadable digital content, namely, video files, audio files, images, text files and e-books in the fields of entertainment, business, music, sports, films, art, cultural activities and education via the Internet, mobile devices, wireless internet networks or systems and other computer and electronic communication networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring downloadable pre-recorded digital content, namely, video files, audio files, images, text files and e-books provided via the Internet, mobile devices, wireless internet networks or systems and other computer and electronic communication networks through subscriptions, subscribe-to-view and one-time purchases; advertising and marketing services provided via the Internet, mobile devices, wireless internet networks or systems and other computer and electronic communication networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to upload and share user-generated videos on a wide variety of topics and subjects; Providing web and cloud based file sharing, management and transfer services, namely, providing a website featuring technology enabling users to upload and download electronic files; Audio, video and digital content download services, namely, providing a website featuring technology enabling users to download electronic files provided over the Internet, mobile devices, wireless internet networks or systems and other computer and electronic communication networks; Software as a Service (SaaS) featuring software for use in connection with audio, video and digital content subscription service and one-time purchases of audio, video and digital content, namely, allowing users to pay for and create seller content | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CHNL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CHNL, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CHNL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 2, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 15, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 26, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 1, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 31, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 5, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |