Drawing for RICH GIRLZ

USPTO serial 85333485

RICH GIRLZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FICKES, JERI J
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with RICH GIRLZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Ingram

JOHN INGRAM BALDONADO & ASSOCIATES, P.C.1370 Broadway, 5th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10018UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Beads for use in the manufacture of jewelry; Body jewelry; Bracelets; Bracelets and jewelry featuring electronic chips for attracting energy to the body wherein the electronic chips increase in power in the presence of electromagnetic fields, for the purpose of re-balancing the human energy field; Broaches; Bronze jewelry; Brooches; Cameos; Charms; Charms for collar jewelry and bracelet; Costume jewelry; Diamond jewelry; Gemstone jewelry; Gold thread jewelry; Hair jewelry in the nature of jewelry for use in the hair; Identification bracelets; Inexpensive non-jewelry watches; Jewelry; Jewelry and imitation jewelry; Jewelry armoires; Jewelry boxes; Jewelry boxes not of metal; Jewelry boxes of metal; Jewelry boxes of precious metal; Jewelry brooches; Jewelry cases; Jewelry cases not of precious metal; Jewelry cases of precious metal; Jewelry caskets; Jewelry caskets of precious metal; Jewelry chains; Jewelry dishes; Jewelry findings; Jewelry for attachment to clothing; Jewelry for the head; Jewelry in the nature of armbands; Jewelry incorporating a computer storage device containing medical information for medical alert purposes; Jewelry making kits; Jewelry organizers; Jewelry pins for use on hats; Jewelry ring holders; Jewelry stickpins; Jewelry that fits over the front teeth; Jewelry that incorporates technology for rebalancing the human energy field; Jewelry to be affixed to bikinis; Jewelry watches; Jewelry, namely, amulets; Jewelry, namely, anklets; Jewelry, namely, arm cuffs; Jewelry, namely, bracelets, wristbands and necklaces that also provides notification to the wearer of a pending medical related task; Jewelry, namely, crosses; Jewelry, namely, dog tags for wear by humans for decorative purposes; Jewelry, namely, magnetic necklaces; Jewelry, namely, magnetic pendants; Jewelry, namely, precious metal plated real leaves and flowers; Jewelry, namely, stone pendants; Lapel pins; Leather jewelry and accessory boxes; Metal wire for use in the making of jewelry, namely, jewelry cable; Ornaments of precious metal in the nature of jewelry; Pet jewelry; Pins being jewelry; Plastic bracelets in the nature of jewelry; Precious and semi-precious crystal stones and beads for use in jewelry; Rings; Rings being jewelry; Stainless steel jewelry bracelets; Watches and jewelry; Watches, clocks, jewelry and imitation jewelry; Women's jewelryACTIVEFeb 1, 2011

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 9, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 11, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2014CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 28, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2013UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Nov 8, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 8, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 6, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2013CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 31, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 5, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2012CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2012SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 18, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 22, 2012IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 22, 2012EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 22, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 25, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 15, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 15, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 3, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance