USPTO serial 85333626
NOURISH BY NATURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOURISH BY NATURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Port Washington, NY
Port Washington, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberly B. Malerba
KIMBERLY B. MALERBA RUSKIN MOSCOU FALTISCHEK, P.C.1425 RXR PLZUNIONDALE, NY 11556-3807UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Printed publications, namely, handouts and recipe cards pertaining to the fields of nutrition, health, exercise, cooking and wellness; Blank journals containing some pre-printed text pertaining to the fields of nutrition, health, exercise and wellness; (Based on Intent to Use in Commerce); Stationery, in the nature of social note cards | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2010 |
| 041 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Providing educational programs, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conference and workshops, in the fields of nutrition, health and wellness; providing information about exercise and health education via phone and the Internet; Educational services, namely, developing, organizing and conducting online, teleconferencing, and in-person educational meetings, classes, programs, workshops, and seminars, group and private instruction in the fields of nutrition, health, wellness and exercise, and distribution of printed materials in connection therewith in hard copy or electronic format on the same topics(Based on Intent to Use in Commerce) Educational services, namely, developing, organizing and conducting videoconferencing educational meetings, classes, programs, workshops, and seminars, group and private instruction in the fields of nutrition, health, wellness and exercise, and distribution of printed materials in connection therewith in hard copy or electronic format on the same topics; Development and dissemination of educational materials of others in the field of nutrition, health, exercise, cooking and wellness; educational services, namely, providing online non-downloadable publications in the nature of news articles and e-newsletters about health and nutrition | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2010 |
| 044 | Consulting services in the field of health, wellness and nutrition; holistic health counseling services; Counseling services in the fields of health, nutrition and lifestyle wellness provided in-person and via phone, online chat or videoconferencing; health care services, namely, wellness programs | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nourish By Nature, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Nourish By Nature, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named NOURISH BY NATURE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 23, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 19, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 24, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | PBPO | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 6, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |