Drawing for TIMELESS QUALITY

USPTO serial 85333967

TIMELESS QUALITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHELI, ANGELA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIMELESS QUALITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Chad M. Smith

Chad M. Smith Ironmark Law Group, PLLC2311 N. 45th Street, Suite 365Seattle, WA 98103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025(Based on Use in Commerce) Clothing, namely, jackets, sweaters, sweatshirts, pants, t-shirts, shirts, vests and outerwear, namely, snow pants, snow jackets, snow suits, insulated and thermal pants, jackets, and shirts; headgear, namely, hats, caps; (Based on Intent to Use) Footwear; snowboarding bootsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 7, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 3, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 26, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 27, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 27, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 15, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 5, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 27, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 27, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 27, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 20, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 26, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 26, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 27, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 1, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 22, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 15, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 3, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance