Drawing for ARBORMETRIX

USPTO serial 85333987

ARBORMETRIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWERS, ALEXANDER L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ARBORMETRIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary A. Kendra

GARY A. KENDRA KENDRA LAW FIRM143 CADYCENTRE # 319NORTHVILLE, MI 48167-1119UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in the healthcare field, namely, software for measuring, analyzing and improving hospital quality and cost-efficiencyACTIVESep 1, 2011
035Business services provided to the healthcare industry, namely, the collection, reporting, and analysis of healthcare quality and cost data for business purposesACTIVESep 1, 2011

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 25, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 29, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2012CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2012SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 25, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 30, 2012IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 30, 2012EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Mar 6, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 23, 2012ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Dec 1, 2011ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 6, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 5, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 20, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 20, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 15, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 3, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance