USPTO serial 85334764
5DX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARK, JENNY K
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 5DX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Liss
MARK J. LISS LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER, LTD.2 PRUDENTIAL PLAZA 180 N STETSON AVE STE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Digital signal processing for movies audience effects; Development of software for movies audience effects; Digital signal processing for movies audience effects in cinemas with special effects such as wind, scent, water spray, motion, vibration, smoke, bubble, laser or flash; Development of software for movies audience effects in cinemas with special effects such as wind, scent, water spray, motion, vibration, smoke, bubble, laser or flash; Computer programming; Conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; Rental of application software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |