Drawing for RESMARK

USPTO serial 85335315

RESMARK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RESMARK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David W. Grace

DAVID W. GRACE LOEB & LOEB LLP10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 2200LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4120UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Shopping mall services, namely, management and operation assistance to commercial businesses and advertising and marketing services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others by distributing advertising materials through a variety of meansACTIVE—
036Shopping mall services, namely, leasing and operating shopping mall space for sellers and consumers of goods and servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 15, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 15, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 8, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 8, 2014NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
May 7, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 7, 2014DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 2, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 2, 2014DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 2, 2014ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
May 2, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 2, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 2, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Oct 10, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 2, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 2, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 25, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 22, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 21, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Jun 20, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 20, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 17, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 16, 2013NOACCORRECTED NOA MAILED—
Apr 14, 2013DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 11, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 10, 2013DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2013ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2012NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 18, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 15, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 15, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 7, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 7, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 7, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 17, 2012UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jan 10, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 10, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 5, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance