USPTO serial 85335652
PAYO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROBERTSON, DEIRDRE G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PAYO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Sydney NSW, AU
North Sydney NSW, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ian L. Saffer
IAN L. SAFFER KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP1400 WEWATTA ST STE 600DENVER, CO 80202-5549UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Applications being software and software downloadable from the Internet for automated delivery of online information, bill presentation and payment, performing online financial transactions, customer relationship management and electronic marketing, clearing and reconciling of financial transactions, electronic payment, financial payment and payment processing | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Data processing services relating to payment switch services | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Clearing and reconciling financial transactions via a global computer network; electronic bill payment services, financial bill payment services, bill payment processing services; electronic funds transfer by telecommunications, namely, automated delivery of secure online funds transfer facilitating secure online payment for goods and services | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Electronic data storage | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of software systems for others; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; maintenance of computer software; providing online non-downloadable software for automated delivery of online information, bill presentation and payment, performing online financial transactions, customer relationship management and electronic marketing; software consulting services relating to electronic payment processing software that provides automated delivery of online information, bill presentment and payment, online transactions, customer relationship management and electronic marketing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by eWise Systems Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by eWise Systems Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PAYO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 16, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 15, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 13, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 28, 2012 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 2, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 16, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |