Drawing for BETTER THAN A CHECKING ACCOUNT

USPTO serial 85336744

BETTER THAN A CHECKING ACCOUNT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BETTER THAN A CHECKING ACCOUNT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Beth M. Goldman

Beth M. Goldman ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP2050 MAIN STREET, SUITE 1100IRVINE, CA 92614-8255UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial services, namely, credit card, debit card, bank card, smart card, payment card, and stored-value card transaction processing services; financial transaction processing services, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options for customers using a smart phone or mobile device at a point of sale; credit card, debit card, bank card, smart card, payment card, and stored-value card verification services; verification services for commercial transactions and payments made by customers using a smart phone or mobile device at a point of sale; credit card, debit card, bank card, smart card, payment card, and stored-value card authorization services; authorization services for commercial transactions and payments made by customers using a smart phone or mobile device at a point of sale; electronic payment, namely, electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data; providing electronic processing of credit card, debit card, bank card, smart card, payment card, and stored-value card transactions all via a proprietary and secure financial global computer network; providing electronic processing of commercial transactions and payments made by customers using a smart phone or mobile device at a point of sale via a proprietary and secure financial global computer network; financial administration of debit card, smart card, payment card, stored-value card, smart phone and mobile device payment account services utilizing a computer readable device; electronic funds transfer services; clearing and reconciling financial transactions via a global computer network for retail merchants; providing commercial financial transaction data, including account balance data to merchants regarding credit card, debit card, bank card, smart card, payment card, stored-value card, and smart phone and mobile device payment accounts via a secure Internet website; information services, namely, financial information provided by electronic means; financial services, namely, electronic remote check deposit services on behalf of merchants; electronic check processing on behalf of merchants; providing electronic processing of electronic funds transfer, ACH, credit card, debit card, electronic check, and electronic payments via telephone and the internet; providing electronic processing of re-presented check transactions and electronic payments related thereto via a global computer network; financial services, namely, providing on-line stored value accounts in an electronic environment; stored value card services; stored value prepaid card services, namely, processing electronic payments made through prepaid cardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 8, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 5, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 5, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 5, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 10, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 29, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 29, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 29, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 29, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 29, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 8, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 18, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 24, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2011GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 18, 2011GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 18, 2011CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 14, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance