USPTO serial 85337314
SPOTMI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPOTMI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Foothill Ranch, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hani Z. Sayed
HANI Z. SAYED RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP611 ANTON BLVD STE 1400COSTA MESA, CA 92626-1931UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Marketing services, namely, collecting, compiling, organizing, mapping, profiling, tracking, analyzing and sharing behavioral information and data regarding the communications and Internet searching activities collected and conducted by users of computers, televisions, entertainment systems, security systems, wireless, mobile and other devices for the purpose of customizing users' website portals; Providing users of computers, televisions, entertainment systems, security systems, wireless, mobile and other devices and third parties with collected and analyzed information, data and research in the field of compilation of information on the Internet which allows users to share, store, rate, transfer, and track the actions and behaviors of other users and third parties for the purpose of customizing users website portals; Providing on-line management of web-based on-line customized portals that are created by providing users and third parties access to collected and analyzed information, data and research from and about these users and third parties in order to share, store, rate, transfer and track actions of other users and third parties | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing access to an online database of collected and analyzed information, data and research from and about users of computers, televisions, entertainment systems, security systems, wireless, mobile and other devices and third parties which allows users to share, store, rate, transfer and track actions and electronic transmissions of such users and third parties for the purpose of customizing users' website portals | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, search engine optimization and customization of third party websites featuring user-defined information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2013 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 16, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 31, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |