USPTO serial 85337782
NOVACLEAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOVACLEAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. Henricks
JAMES A. HENRICKS HENRICKS, SLAVIN & HOLMES LLP840 APOLLO ST STE 200EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245-4737UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Disposable and reusable cleaning materials, namely, wipes impregnated with cleansing chemicals or compounds to degrease equipment and surfaces, namely, walls, floors, ceilings, counters, furniture, coverings, glass and glassware and equipment; wipes impregnated with cleansing chemicals or compounds to degrease stainless steel, transparent plastic and acrylic cabinets, isolators, curtains; wipes impregnated with cleansing chemicals or compounds to degrease surfaces, namely, stainless steel, transparent plastic and acrylic cabinets, isolators, curtains; pre-saturated wipes impregnated with cleansing chemicals or compounds for use on clean room surfaces, namely, walls, floors, ceilings, counters, furniture, coverings, glass and glassware and equipment, wipes impregnated with cleansing chemicals or compounds for use on cabinets, isolators, and curtains, pre-saturated wipes impregnated with cleansing chemicals or compounds for use on cabinets, isolators and curtains; Disposable wipes not impregnated with chemicals or compounds; Fabric cleanroom wipes impregnated with chemicals or compounds for stainless steel, transparent plastic and acrylic cabinets, isolators, curtains | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Disposable and reusable cleaning materials, namely, wipes impregnated with chemicals or compounds to sterilize, disinfect, and decontaminate equipment and surfaces, namely, walls, floors, ceilings, counters, furniture, coverings, glass and glassware and equipment; wipes impregnated with chemicals or compounds to sterilize, disinfect, and decontaminate stainless steel, transparent plastic and acrylic cabinets, isolators, curtains | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MICRONOVA MANUFACTURING, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MICRONOVA MANUFACTURING, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named NOVACLEAN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 23, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 5, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 28, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 25, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 31, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 17, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 17, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 22, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 2, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 19, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 19, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |