USPTO serial 85338942
TTX - TERRAIN TOUGH EXTREME CHASSIS PARTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASSIDY, COLLEEN MULCRONE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TTX - TERRAIN TOUGH EXTREME CHASSIS PARTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK HARRISON
MARK HARRISON VENABLE LLPPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-4385UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Automotive parts and accessories in the nature of automotive steering, alignment and suspension systems and structural parts for automotive steering, alignment and suspension systems, namely, upper and lower ball joints, inner tie rods, outer tie rods, control arms, control arm and ball joint assemblies, idler arms, pitman arms, stabilizer link kits, sway bar link kits, sway bar bushings, drag links, centre links, strut mounts, shock mounts, torsion bar mounts, control arm bushings, thrust arms, track bars, shims, spacers, wedges, nuts, bolts, washers, sleeves, bearings, braces, caps, bellows, bars and brackets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | RGTT | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 24, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 23, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 10, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 4, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |