USPTO serial 85339179
KORESEAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KORESEAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carolyn E. Knecht
CAROLYN E. KNECHT IPHORGAN LTD.1130 LAKE COOK RD STE 240BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089-1994UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Epoxy molding compounds for use in manufacture of pre-molded frame or PMF, optical connectors and semiconductors; Epoxy resins; Unprocessed epoxy resins; Silicones for use in manufacturing; Silicon; Silicone resins; Silane; Water repellents for use in manufacturing; Defoaming agents; Mould-release preparations; Paper release agents; adhesive gums, other than for stationery or household purposes; Chemicals for industrial purposes, namely, surface-active chemical agents; Artificial resins, namely, alkyd resin, polyester resin, urethane resin, acrylic resin, phenolic resin, and polystyrene resin; Synthetic resin for use in the manufacture of insulation; Synthetic resin for use in the manufacture of castings; Unprocessed artificial resins, namely, unprocessed acrylic resins, unprocessed synthetic resins, unsaturated polyester resin; Ceramic compositions for sintering, namely, granules and powders used in manufacturing; Composites in the nature of ceramic glazings in the nature of dry chemical preparations for the manufacture of technical ceramics; Compositions in the nature of ceramic glazings in the nature of dry chemical preparations for the manufacture of technical ceramics; Ceramics, namely, ceramic powders used in manufacturing; Unprocessed plastics; Chemical preparations for the manufacture of paints; Colour-brightening chemicals for industrial purposes; Adhesives for industrial purposes; Fireproofing preparations; Solvents for varnishes for industrial and commercial use; Oil-separating chemicals for use in manufacturing; Chemical additives for oils; Coagulants for use in manufacturing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2012 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |