USPTO serial 85340107
MAMA MELLACE'S OLD WORLD TREATS NINETEEN SIXTY-TWO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAHILL, CLARE GALLAGHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAMA MELLACE'S OLD WORLD TREATS NINETEEN SIXTY-TWO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicole K. McLaughlin
NICOLE K. MCLAUGHLIN DUANE MORRIS LLP30 S 17TH ST FL 5PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-4196UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed edible nuts; candied nuts; chocolate covered nuts; processed edible seeds; dried fruits; dried fruit mixes; dried fruit and nut mixes; nut-based snack mixes; snack mixes consisting primarily of processed fruits, seeds, and/or nuts; trail mixes consisting primarily of processed fruits, seeds and/or nuts; fruit chips; preserved fruits; sugared fruits; dried prunes, dates, raisins and coconut; glazed fruits; glazed cherries; soup mixes; spreads, namely, nut spread, fruit based spread, hummus spread; dips; snack foods, namely, potato chips; baking goods, namely, fruit fillings for cakes and pies; unflavored gelatins; dried lentils; pulses; peanut butter and other nut butters; soy based products and beverages, namely, soy nuts, soy based chips, soy based snack foods; fruit based snack food | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Snack mixes consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, sesame sticks, chips, and/or popped corn; confectionery, namely, candy and chocolate; spices and seasonings; cocoa spread; salsas; snack foods, namely, puffed corn snacks, sesame sticks, crackers, wafers, cheese puffs, corn based snacks, pretzels, cookies, biscuits, tortilla chips and corn chips; croutons; baking goods, namely, cake mixes, muffin mixes, brownie mixes, pastry mixes, chocolate chips and peanut butter chips, candy mints, baking crumbs, baking powder, baking soda, crust mixes for making pie crusts, fruit jelly powders, graham crumbs, corn starch, vanilla extract; syrups, namely, table syrup, pancake syrup; artificial and natural extracts used as flavoring; flavored gelatins; yeast; cocoa powder; sugar and sugar substitutes; popcorn of various flavors; marshmallows; microwave popcorn; seasonings for popcorn; flours; grains, namely, processed grains for eating; cereals, namely, breakfast cereals; rolled oats and oatmeal; wheat germ; rice; peanut brittle; honey; cereal based snack food; wheat based snack food; rice based snack food; rice cakes; processed cereals; ready to eat cereal-based bars; granola, namely, granola based bars and granola cereals | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Unprocessed edible nuts; unprocessed edible seeds; snack mixes consisting primarily of unprocessed seeds and/or nuts; un-popped popcorn of various flavors; grains, namely, unprocessed grains for eating; fresh lentils; unprocessed cereals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Johnvince Foods Partnership
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named MAMA MELLACE'S OLD WORLD TREATS NINETEEN SIXTY-TWO
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 16, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |