USPTO serial 85340116
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisabeth H. Coakley
LISABETH H. COAKLEY HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C.5445 CORPORATE DR STE 200TROY, MI 48098-2683UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronically, magnetically or optically recorded data, sound and/or video all connected with documentary films; sound and recording media, namely, sound and video recordings featuring documentary films and documentary film sound tracks; magnetic data carriers featuring documentary films or documentary film sound tracks, recording discs featuring documentary films or documentary film sound tracks; DVDs, video and audio cassettes, tapes and cartridges, and phonograph records featuring documentary films and documentary film sound tracks; video discs featuring documentary films and documentary film sound tracks; compact discs featuring documentary films and documentary film sound tracks; motion pictures films in the field of documentaries; pre-recorded DVD's, video cassettes, pre-recorded tapes and video discs in the field of documentaries; pre-recorded compact discs, audio and video cassette tapes all containing recorded data, sound and video in the field of documentaries | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, production of documentary films for viewing via cinema, television and other media; film production, namely, production of documentary films; motion picture film production, namely, production of documentary films; entertainment, namely, production of documentary films; provision of information in the field of documentary films; providing online access to digital materials relating to documentary films via the global computer network; film editing in connection with documentary films; digital video, audio, and multimedia publishing services in connection with documentary films; distribution of documentary films; rental of documentary films and of related sound recordings; rental and computerized on-line rental services featuring interactive software and hardware, home entertainment and consumer electronics in the nature of motion pictures, films, movies, pre-recorded digital versatile discs, or DVDs, pre-recorded videotape cassettes, audio, audio recordings in the genre of documentary films; multimedia entertainment services in the nature of recording, production and post-production services in the field of documentary films; providing information and articles in the field of documentary films and documentary filmmaking via a global computer network; production of visual effects for documentary films; entertainment services, namely, providing podcasts in the field of documentary films; entertainment media production services for documentary films | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 3, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 18, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |