USPTO serial 85340937
THE 10X COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAKER, JORDAN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE 10X COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven T. Zuschlag
Steven T. Zuschlag HOFFMANN & BARON, LLP6900 JERICHO TPKESYOSSET, NY 11791-4499UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded DVDs and compact discs featuring instructional guides for use with professional and personal development training programs; electronic publications, namely, manuals and books recorded on computer media, featuring instructional guides for use with professional and personal development training programs; educational software featuring professional and personal development training programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Books and manuals, in the field of professional and personal development training programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing and conducting seminars, workshops and private study programs in the field of professional and personal development | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 27, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2012 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |