Drawing for OWN BIO-ACTIVATING

USPTO serial 85341533

OWN BIO-ACTIVATING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OWN BIO-ACTIVATING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kelly Phair McCarthy

KELLY PHAIR MCCARTHY SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP1 EMBARCADERO CTR FL 8SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3629UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Specialized tablets and powders for delivery of plant and herb extracts for cosmetic purposesACTIVE—
005Specialized tablets and powders for delivery of plant and herb extracts for medicinal purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 25, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 25, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 28, 2012NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 25, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 25, 2012IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 14, 2012INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Jul 10, 2012INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Jul 5, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 14, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 14, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 24, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 8, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 9, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 26, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 28, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 27, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 13, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance