Drawing for PUREVOICE

USPTO serial 85342601

PUREVOICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARLSEN, EMILY K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PUREVOICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raymond R. Tabandeh

Raymond R. Tabandeh CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE, LLPPO BOX 29001GLENDALE, CA 91209-9001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009PRE-RECORDED AUDIO AND VIDEO MEDIUMS, NAMELY, FLASH MEMORY CARDS, FLASH DRIVES, RECORDING DISKS, AND DVDS ALL CONCERNING PERSONAL FULFILLMENT; DOWNLOADABLE DIGITAL MEDIA, NAMELY, AUDIO FILES FEATURING MESSAGES OF PERSONAL FULFILLMENT; DOWNLOADABLE ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS IN THE NATURE OF ARTICLES IN THE FIELD OF PERSONAL FULFILLMENT, NAMELY, DOWNLOADABLE DIGITAL FILES CONTAINING ARTWORK, AND MUSIC RELATING TO PERSONAL FULFILLMENTACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 4, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 4, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 3, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 8, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 8, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 18, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 31, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 14, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 14, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 22, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 15, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 14, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance