USPTO serial 85342937
WET-REPEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4162568Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 19, 2012
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, MICHELLE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WET-REPEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brett M. Hutton, Esq.
BRETT M. HUTTON, ESQ. HESLIN ROTHENBERG FARLEY & MESITI, P.C.5 COLUMBIA CIRALBANY, NY 12203-5180UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Protective sealer coatings for metal, wood, masonry, and cement | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 14, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 16, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2012 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2012 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |