Drawing for CDFA

USPTO serial 85343242

CDFA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRODY, DANIEL S
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CDFA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Devon E. White

TREVOR P SCHMIDT HUTCHISON PLLC3110 EDWARDS MILL ROADSUITE 300RALEIGH, NC 27612

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
BFinancial analyses in the field of divorceABANDONEDOct 1, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 8, 2015MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 8, 2015ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 8, 2015OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 8, 2015OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Apr 20, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 10, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 6, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2013OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 21, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 21, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 31, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 11, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 29, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 29, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 29, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 28, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2011CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2011CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 20, 2011GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2011GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2011CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Sep 13, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 15, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance