USPTO serial 85343348
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dmitriy O. Makarov
DMITRIY O MAKAROV IPHORGAN LTD1130 LAKE COOK RDSUITE 240BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | combination fabrics for textile use, combination cotton fabrics, terry fabrics, interlining base fabrics for textile use, cotton knitting fabrics, nylon knitting fabrics, polyester blend knitting fabrics, nylon synthetic fabrics, polyester blend synthetic fabrics, spandex synthetic fabrics, cotton non-woven fabrics, nylon non-woven fabrics, polyester blend non-woven fabrics, rayon non-woven fabrics, cotton semi-synthetic fabrics, nylon semi-synthetic fabrics, polyester semi-synthetic fabrics, cotton calico fabrics, nylon calico fabrics, polyester blend calico fabrics, cotton artificial fabrics, nylon artificial fabrics, polyester blend artificial fabrics, cotton weaving fabrics, nylon weaving fabrics, polyester blend weaving fabrics, cotton abrasion-resistant fabrics, nylon abrasion-resistant fabrics, polyester blend abrasion-resistant fabrics, nylon flexible fabrics, polyester blend flexible fabrics, spandex flexible fabrics, nylon waterproof fabrics, polyester blend waterproof fabrics, spandex waterproof fabrics, woolen fabrics, calico fabric, cotton fabrics, chenille fabrics, cloth cheviots, dimity fabrics, canvas for tapestry, elastic woven materials being fabrics, fabrics for textile use, fiberglass fabrics for textile use, fabrics for boots and shoes, fabric impervious to gases for aeronautical balloons, eiderdowns being bedding cloth gauze fabrics, hat linings of textile sold in one piece, upholstery fabrics, velvet fabrics, hemp cloth fabrics, hemp fabrics, household linen, knitted fabrics, lingerie fabrics, lining fabrics for shoes, quilts, ramie fabrics, rayon fabrics, silk fabrics for printing patterns, drugget lap rugs, sleeping bags in the nature of sheeting, traveling rugs being lap robes, pillowcases, mosquito nets, bed clothes being bed linens, bed blankets, bedspreads, bed covers, bed linen, mattress covers, wall hangings of textile, door curtains, net curtains, shower curtains of textile and plastic, curtains of textile and plastic, covers for cushions, unfitted covers for furniture of plastic and fabric, loose unfitted covers for furniture of plastic and fabric, unfitted furniture coverings of textile plastic and fabric, handkerchiefs of textile, napkins of cloth for removing make-up, face towels of textile, fabric table runners, coasters in the nature table linens, place mats not of paper, table napkins of textile, bath linen, tissues of textile for removing make-up, sanitary flannels, serviettes of textile, towels of textile, washing mitts, textile banners, textile bunting, flags not of paper, cloth labels; filtering materials of textile, namely, felt cloth, gauze fabric | ABANDONED | Apr 25, 2011 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 8, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |