USPTO serial 85343467
SILICON BEACH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SILICON BEACH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MEI TSANG
MEI TSANG FISH & ASSOCIATES PC2603 MAIN STREETSUITE 1000IRVINE, CA 92614Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing searchable databases of information and data and for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage and sharing of data and generation of reports thereof in the fields of medical, health care, fitness, music, education, entertainment and media; providing computer network-based online directory of information in the nature of indexes of information, websites, and resources in the fields of medical, health care, fitness, music, education, entertainment and media | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, providing electronic transmission of data and documents over computerized electronic communications networks; instant messaging services; voice over internet protocol (VOIP) services; electronic data transmission of data and documents via computer terminals and electronic devices; receiving, processing, transmitting and delivering information captured by a mobile device for the purpose of providing advertisement, marketing and promotion and related information; peer-to-peer network computer services, namely, electronic transmission of audio, video and other data and documents among computers; providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning the fields of medical, health care, fitness, music, education, entertainment and media; streaming of audio, visual and audiovisual material via a global computer network; providing on-line chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among users in the fields of medical, health care, fitness, music, education, entertainment and media | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Information technology and data services, namely, integration of computer systems and networks; providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; providing use of a non-downloadable web based software application to ensure selection of and reimbursement for appropriate treatments for illness and to reduce costs and unnecessary utilization in the treatment of critical illnesses and to provide medical information between providers, subscribers and insurers | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Online social networking services provided through a community of registered users to participate in discussions, get feedback from others, engage in networking | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nant Holdings IP, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named SILICON BEACH
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 23, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |