Drawing for MIRROR MIRROR: A SURVIVAL GUIDE TO

USPTO serial 85343646

MIRROR MIRROR: A SURVIVAL GUIDE TO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ORNDORFF, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIRROR MIRROR: A SURVIVAL GUIDE TO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katherine Koyanagi

Katherine Koyanagi Law Offices of Katherine Koyanagi11301 W. Olympic Blvd., #324Los Angeles, CA 90064UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016A series of books and written articles in the field of travel, food and lifestyle topicsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 28, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 22, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2015EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 20, 2015EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 20, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 25, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 23, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 23, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 27, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 25, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 25, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 25, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 28, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 28, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 27, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 27, 2014TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 27, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 27, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 31, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 26, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 24, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 23, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 27, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Nov 27, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 27, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 30, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 26, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 26, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 1, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 1, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 27, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 8, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 18, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 18, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 15, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance