USPTO serial 85344104
SEX HAIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, MICHELLE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEX HAIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Clarke F. Ahlers, Esquire
CLARKE F AHLERS CLARKE F AHLERS PC10450 SHAKER DRIVE SUITE 111COLUMBIA, MD 21046UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Pajamas; T-shirts for women | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 27, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 27, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 27, 2013 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 17, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |