USPTO serial 85344126
RARE PEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4990977Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 5, 2016
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RARE PEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shady Glen Enterprises Limited
West Vancouver, BC, CA
Shady Glen Enterprises Limited
West Vancouver, BC, CA
Shady Glen Enterprises Limited
West Vancouver, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kirsten Severson
KIRSTEN SEVERSON KLS TRADEMARK SERVICESPO BOX 19126 4TH AVENUE POSTVANCOUVER, BC, V6K4R8CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Food products, namely, vinegars, salad dressings, marinades, infused oils and dipping sauces | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Shady Glen Enterprises Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Shady Glen Enterprises Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Shady Glen Enterprises Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named RARE PEAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 5, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 21, 2016 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 3, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 8, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 19, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |