Drawing for CONSIDER IT DONE

USPTO serial 85344795

CONSIDER IT DONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONSIDER IT DONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott W. Smilie

SCOTT W SMILIE PATZIK FRANK & SAMOTNY LTD150 S WACKER DRIVESUTIE 1500CHICAGO, IL 60606-4201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consultation services related to the development and use of flavorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 27, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 27, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 12, 2013EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 15, 2012RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Sep 22, 2012GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2012GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2012CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 24, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 21, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 21, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 9, 2012RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Feb 9, 2012RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2012RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Jan 19, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 22, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 22, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 27, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 24, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance