USPTO serial 85344917
CUTICLE REMY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CUTICLE REMY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Port Washington, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John K. Kim
John K. Kim GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP200 PARK AVE STE 104FLORHAM PARK, NJ 07932-1092UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | hair products, namely, hair pieces, wigs, hair extensions and ponytail hair pieces | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2015 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 25, 2015 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 16, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |