USPTO serial 85345148
BATTLE SPORTS IMPACT INDICATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BATTLE SPORTS IMPACT INDICATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TRACY L. DEUTMEYER
TRACY L DEUTMEYER MCGRATH NORTH MULLIN & KRATZ PC LLO1601 DODGE ST STE 3700OMAHA, NE 68102-1650UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Safety device embedded in a chin strap to measure the impact of a hit to a player's helmet; Sports helmets; Protective sports helmet accessories that attach to the helmets, namely, face masks and mouth guards; Electronic monitoring devices incorporating microprocessors, digital display, and accelerometers, for detecting, storing, reporting, monitoring, uploading and downloading sport, fitness training, and activity data to the internet, and communication with gaming consoles and personal computers, regarding time, pace, speed, steps taken, athletic skill, calories burned, heart and body rate, global positioning, direction, distance, altitude, navigational and weather information; chin straps for electronic monitoring devices that incorporate indicators that light up and change color based on wearer's cumulative activity level; electronic monitoring devices incorporating indicators that light up and change color based on wearer's cumulative activity level; protective headgear for boxing | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Protective padding for baseball, snowboarding, softball, lacrosse, mixed martial arts, skiing, hockey, and football; Chest protectors for baseball, softball, lacrosse and hockey; Face masks for baseball, softball, lacrosse and hockey; Shin pads for use in baseball, softball, lacrosse, hockey and mixed martial arts; Kidney belts for sports; Sporting goods and equipment, namely, baseball and softball batting gloves, lip protectors for sports, protective athletic cups, athletic supporters, football hand gloves, padded head guards for soccer and adhesive under-eye glare reduction strips; athletic equipment, namely, mouth guards and striking bags | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 4, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |