Drawing for WE TALK INNOVATION

USPTO serial 85345238

WE TALK INNOVATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WE TALK INNOVATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher L. Bernard

CHRISTOPHER L. BERNARD CLEMENTS BERNARD1901 ROXBOROUGH RD STE 250CHARLOTTE, NC 28211-5588UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Medical diagnostic test strips for determining the levels of glucose in bloodACTIVEMay 15, 2010
010Blood glucose meters; blood glucose monitoring kits primarily composed of blood glucose meters sold with test accessories used therewithACTIVEMay 15, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2012MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 15, 2012ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 14, 2012EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 14, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 13, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance