Drawing for EZ SHAKE

USPTO serial 85345273

EZ SHAKE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EZ SHAKE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Noah M. Roth

NOAH M. ROTH LAW OFFICE OF NOAH M. ROTH2066 LAVISTA RD NEATLANTA, GA 30329-3928UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electric mixers for household purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 4, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 4, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 30, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 5, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 5, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 31, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 6, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 16, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 1, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 4, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 29, 2011GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 29, 2011GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 29, 2011CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 26, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 18, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 17, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance