Drawing for FRAGRANCE PODS

USPTO serial 85345544

FRAGRANCE PODS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILLIS, PAMELA Y
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRAGRANCE PODS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James P. Broder

James P. Broder ROEDER & BRODER LLP4817 Biona Dr.SAN DIEGO, CA 92116United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Room freshenersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 4, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 4, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 21, 2013EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 25, 2012RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Sep 18, 2012GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2012GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2012CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 26, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 25, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 25, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 18, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 18, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 18, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 14, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 11, 2012PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
May 31, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 23, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 27, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 11, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 6, 2011PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Aug 24, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 19, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 15, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 15, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 12, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance