Drawing for AD OPEN AUDITION

USPTO serial 85345628

AD OPEN AUDITION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AD OPEN AUDITION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Pamela Rask

PAMELA RASK Sabin, Bermant & Gould LLPOne World Trade CenterNEW YORK, NY 10007-2915UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software application, namely, software for providing access to information and advice in the field of architecture and design for use in connection with smartphones, PDA devices and tablet computersACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, organizing, arranging and conducting competitions and awards in the fields of architecture and design; entertainment in the nature of ongoing television programs in the field of architecture and designACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 27, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 6, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2015EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 23, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 23, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 11, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 20, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 21, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 15, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 17, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 16, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 26, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 26, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 26, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 5, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 3, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 3, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 26, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 1, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 1, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 11, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 23, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 6, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 6, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 29, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance