USPTO serial 85346485
HGS DIRECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HGS DIRECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Downers Grove, IL
Downers Grove, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Porter
NINA HABIB BORDERS REED SMITH LLP1510 PAGE MILL ROADSUITE 110PALO ALTO, CA 94304Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Packaging design services, namely, custom design of packaging materials to the order and specification of others in the fields of supplier management, supplier qualification, inventory management, stock and custom product sourcing, procurement, category management, supplier performance, contract management, spend management analyses, freight and logistics optimization, competitive intelligence, diversity management, environmental impact and compliance analyses, graphics and brand development and management, packaging design, packaging research and development and quality control; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for supply chain management and inventory ordering | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 25, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 24, 2018 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 14, 2018 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 2, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 6, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |