USPTO serial 85346496
HGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Downers Grove, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Porter
NINA HABIB BORDERS REED SMITH LLP1510 PAGE MILL ROADSUITE 110PALO ALTO, CA 94304Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Supply chain management services; marketing and promotions management services; market analysis services in the nature of forecasting, marketplace analyses, and market analysis concerning supply and demand planning; marketing consulting services; business consulting services in the field of product distribution, operations management, logistics, reverse logistics, supply chain, production systems, procurement, business processes, inventory control, distribution solutions and sourcing strategies for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2018 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 10, 2018 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 2, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 6, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |