USPTO serial 85346667
RUFFNECK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RUFFNECK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ironclad Performance Wear Corp.
El Segundo, CA
BRIGHTON-BEST INTERNATIONAL, INC.
LONG BEACH, CA
Ironclad Performance Wear Corp.
Farmers Branch, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY F. GERSH
JEFFREY F. GERSH Stubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP15260 Ventura Boulevard, 20th FloorSherman Oaks, CA 91403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Work gloves | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ironclad Performance Wear Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by BRIGHTON-BEST INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Ironclad Performance Wear Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named RUFFNECK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 27, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 6, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 8, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 28, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 10, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 26, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 23, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 26, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 15, 2012 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |