Drawing for SKIN TIME

USPTO serial 85346865

SKIN TIME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SKIN TIME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert B.G. Horowitz, Esq.

ROBERT B.G. HOROWITZ, ESQ. BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP45 ROCKEFELLER PLZ FL 10NEW YORK, NY 10111-0230UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated foot cream, face wash, hand cream, shower gel, body butter, face day and night cream, body cream, eye cream, bath salt, body scrub, anti aging face creamsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 8, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 5, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 5, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 5, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 13, 2012ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Dec 8, 2011ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 9, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 24, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 28, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 28, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 26, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance