Drawing for LEGACY.TV

USPTO serial 85347502

LEGACY.TV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POLZER, NATALIE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEGACY.TV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David W. Grace

DAVID W. GRACE LOEB & LOEB LLP10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 2200LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4120UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Providing entertainment, educational and informational television programming in the fields of business, entertainment, medicine, healthcare, psychology, legal, sports, accomplished artists, scholars, philanthropists, and entrepreneurs accessible by satellite, television, Internet, wireless networks and through transmission of audio and/or video signals to any type of visual display device; production and distribution of television showsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 14, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 14, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 29, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 28, 2015EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 6, 2015EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 6, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 6, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 3, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 3, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 3, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 10, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 9, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 7, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 7, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 7, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 12, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 7, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 3, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 3, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 14, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 10, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 10, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 10, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 20, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 13, 2012NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 2, 2012ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Sep 27, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 11, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 22, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 29, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 15, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 14, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 28, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 27, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance