USPTO serial 85347642
ILEGRA THINK BEYOND.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ILEGRA THINK BEYOND.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert M. Leonardi
ROBERT M. LEONARDI MACMILLAN, SOBANSKI & TODD, LLC720 WATER ST FL 5TOLEDO, OH 43604-1883UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Advisory services in the field of product development and quality improvement of software; Computer monitoring service which tracks hardware performance and processes and sends out historical reports and alerts; Computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for the purpose of creating searchable databases of information and data and searching and retrieving information from databases and computer networks; Computer software design; Computer software design, computer programming, or maintenance of computer software; Computer software development; Computer software development and computer programming development for others; Computer software development in the field of mobile applications; Customized software development services; Design, development, installation and maintenance of computer software; Design, installation, updating and maintenance of computer software; Design, maintenance, development and updating of computer software; Development, updating and maintenance of software and data bases; Technical support services, namely, 24x7 monitoring of network systems, servers and web and database applications and notification of related events and alerts; Technical support services, namely, installation, administration, and troubleshooting of web and database applications; Technical support services, namely, migration of datacenter, server and database applications; Technical support services, namely, remote administration and management of in-house and hosted datacenter devices, databases and software applications; Technical support services, namely, remote and on-site infrastructure management services for monitoring, administration and management of public and private cloud computing IT and application systems | ACTIVE | Feb 28, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |