Drawing for CUSTOMER CAPABLE

USPTO serial 85347891

CUSTOMER CAPABLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIBB, SCOTT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CUSTOMER CAPABLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leonora Hoicka

Leonora Hoicka International Business Machines CorpNorth Castle DriveIntellectual Property - TrademarksArmonk, NY 10504

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software that provides real-time, integrated business management intelligence by combining information from various databases and presenting it in an easy-to-understand user interface; computer search engine softwareACTIVE—
042Consulting services in the field of computer-based information systems for businesses; computer services, namely, creating computer network-based indexes of information, websites and resources; data mining; computer software consulting services; computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on the Internet and corporate Intranets; design, development and consulting services related thereto in the field of computer software; consulting services in the field of computer-based information systems for businessesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 27, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 26, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 13, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 26, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 24, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 24, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 24, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 24, 2012NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 29, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 9, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 20, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 17, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 27, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 27, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance