USPTO serial 85348132
AUDIO CANDY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HENRY, NAKIA D
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUDIO CANDY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK E. TETREAULT
MARK E. TETREAULT BARLOW, JOSEPHS & HOLMES, LTD.40 WESTMINSTER STREET, 3RD FLOORPROVIDENCE, RI 02903-3926UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | loudspeaker systems; electronic docking stations; stands specially designed for holding portable and handheld digital electronic devices, namely, phones and portable music streaming devices; battery chargers; battery packs; electrical connectors, wires, cables, and adaptors; wired and wireless remote controls for portable and handheld digital electronic devices, namely, phones and portable music streaming devices; stereo amplifier and speaker base stations, namely, stands with audio speakers adapted for phones and portable music streaming devices; radio receivers; radio transmitters; acoustic conduits; acoustic membranes; audio amplifiers; audio mixers; Loudspeakers; sound mixers; stereo amplifiers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2021 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 4, 2021 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 4, 2021 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 4, 2021 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 2021 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 13, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 27, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 8, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 11, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |