USPTO serial 85348348
RUGGEDAPPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RUGGEDAPPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Filip A. Kowalewski
Filip A. Kowalewski Siemens Corporation3501 Quadrangle Boulevard, Suite 230Orlando, FL 32817UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; computer chassis; open frame chassis for enclosed electrical modules; enclosed electrical modules; power modules; line modules; switch modules; control modules; electrical module casings; computer software; computer software for visualizing a computer network; computer software for discovering devices connected to a computer network; communication routers, switches, gateways, computers and modems; fiber optic cables, connectors and filters; fiber optical networks comprised of hubs, switches and fiber-to-electrical media converters, communication hubs, communication routers and switches having mixed fiber optical and electrical media ports; computer network hubs, switches and routers having fiber optical ports; computer hubs, routers and switches having mixed fiber optical and electrical media ports; fiber optical Ethernet networks comprised of hubs, switches, fiber-to-electrical media converters, serial to Ethernet servers, communication hubs, communication routers, computer hubs, computer network routers, switches and serial to Ethernet servers having mixed fiber optic to electrical media ports, and components therefor; computer network hubs, switches and routers having optical ports and components therefor; computer hubs, routers, switches, serial to Ethernet servers and serial device servers having mixed fiber optic and copper ports; video encoders; fiber optic to cable converters; fiber optical to electrical media converters; serial to Ethernet gateways; serial device servers | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | On-line retail store services featuring fiber optical networks, routers, switches, gateways, modems, fiber optic cables, connectors and filters, fiber optical networks, fiber optical Ethernet networks, computer hardware, computer software and communication equipment; computerized on-line retail store services in the field of fiber optical networks, routers, switches, gateways, modems, fiber optic cables, connectors and filters, fiber optical networks, fiber optical Ethernet networks, computer hardware, computer software and communication equipment; online retail store featuring communication routers, switches, gateways, computers, modems, fiber optic cables, connectors and filters, fiber optical networks, fiber optical Ethernet networks; retail store services featuring fiber optical networks, routers, switches, gateways, modems, fiber optic cables, connectors and filters, fiber optical networks, fiber optical Ethernet networks, computer hardware, computer software and communication equipment; exhibition of fiber optical networks, computer hardware, computer software and communications equipment for retail purpose on communication media; providing on-line business information featuring fiber optical networks, computer hardware, computer software and communications equipment; sales promotion featuring fiber optical networks, computer hardware, computer software and communications | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | monitoring of network systems; diagnostic services for network system; computer network design for others; computer network consulting services; computer networking management; communication network consulting services; communication network management; monitoring of computer network systems for system failure or decrease in performance; monitoring of the performance and physical structure of a computer network; monitoring of computer network systems for security purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 18, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |