Drawing for AVATIREE

USPTO serial 85348903

AVATIREE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AVATIREE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Terese R. Cohen

Terese R. Cohen, Esq. Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP250 Greenwich Street7 World Trade CenterNew York, NY 10007

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computerized game software for use on any computerized or Internet enabled platform including mobile phones, mobile devices, hand-held electronic devices, telecommunications devices, electronic communication devices, game consoles and any Internet enabled device; web based applications, namely, downloadable computer game software; mobile applications, namely, downloadable computer game software; mobile game applications, namely, computer game software for use on mobile and cellular phones; computer game software for mobile phones, mobile devices and any Internet enabled device or applianceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 22, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 22, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 10, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 10, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 10, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 20, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 24, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 4, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 19, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 29, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 29, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 26, 2011GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 26, 2011GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 26, 2011CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 25, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance