USPTO serial 85349049
UVERB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REINHART, MEGHAN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UVERB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George G. Grigel
GEORGE G. GRIGEL PAINE HAMBLEN, LLP717 W SPRAGUE AVE STE 1200SPOKANE, WA 99201-3905UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | COMMUNICATION TRANSMISSION SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF TRANSMITTING LIVE, SECURE, AND UNSECURE AUDIO, VISUAL, AND/OR TEXTUAL COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN MULTIPLE PARTIES INCLUDING THE SIMULTANEOUS UPLOADING AND DOWNLOADING OF DOCUMENTS TO MULTIPLE PARTY LOCATIONS, AND FURTHER INCLUDING THE TRANSMISSION OF INDIVIDUAL-TO-INDIVIDUAL LIVE, SECURE AND UNSECURE COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN INDIVIDUAL PARTIES PARTICIPATING IN MULTIPLE PARTY AUDIO VISUAL AND/OR TEXTUAL COMMUNICATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMMUNICATION SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF HOSTING AN ON-LINE COMMUNITY WEBSITE FEATURING SECURE AND UNSECURE, AUDIO, VISUAL AND/OR TEXTUAL COMMUNICATION BETWEEN MULTIPLE PARTIES AND WHICH ALLOWS REGISTERED USERS TO SEND LIVE, SECURE, AND UNSECURED AUDIO, VISUAL AND/OR TEXTUAL COMMUNICATIONS AMONG MULTIPLE PARTIES, TO SIMULTANEOUSLY UPLOAD AND DOWNLOAD DOCUMENTS TO MULTIPLE PARTY LOCATIONS, AND TO CONDUCT INDIVIDUAL-TO-INDIVIDUAL LIVE, SECURE AND UNSECURE COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN INDIVIDUAL PARTIES PARTICIPATING IN MULTIPLE PARTY AUDIO, VISUAL AND/OR TEXTUAL COMMUNICATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 27, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 7, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 7, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 13, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |